🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold move to ban social platforms access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, campaigners, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

The European Trend

In Europe, a rising number of countries are exploring parallel bans.

• The Danish government plans a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the PM arguing that smartphones and apps are "taking away our children's youth". Legislation is expected to be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield children from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have indicated that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential measures on the table".
• In Spain, the president has called on lawmakers to approve a law lifting the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Netherlands has advised guardians to prevent their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory statement supporting a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is granted. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the step does not create binding law.

"An effective age barrier is a solid starting point," said a leading parliamentarian behind the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Approach

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has remained open to a possible ban, stating that "no measure is off the table" but stressing any decision must be "supported by conclusive evidence".

Earlier, interest gathered behind a bill to introduce restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the government committed to further research the matter.

Charities have raised warnings. One foundation set up by the relatives of a teenager who died after viewing dangerous online content argues that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create tools that are safe and fit for minors," commented a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, regulation is mostly unfolding at the state level due to federal stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has signed a law barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a law capping teenagers to one hour of social media use per day, with extra access dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced bills demanding guardian approval for minors to open social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from certain individuals to copy this lead, a US-wide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Beyond Europe and the US, other nations are similarly taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, international organizations adopt a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has warned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "could backfire". The agency highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated young people and that bans should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this global discussion evolves, the steps of Australia and its followers indicate that states globally are less and less willing to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.